Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30461 - 30470 of 57351 for id.
Search results 30461 - 30470 of 57351 for id.
State v. Mikkel J. Goff
). This is a discretionary determination due the deference we normally award evidentiary rulings. Id. at 399
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4169 - 2005-03-31
). This is a discretionary determination due the deference we normally award evidentiary rulings. Id. at 399
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4169 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning.” Id., ¶45. Extrinsic sources, such as legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70634 - 2011-09-07
its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning.” Id., ¶45. Extrinsic sources, such as legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70634 - 2011-09-07
COURT OF APPEALS
on collateral review. Id. at 294, 296. We likewise do not view Dubose as a watershed rule of criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33525 - 2008-07-28
on collateral review. Id. at 294, 296. We likewise do not view Dubose as a watershed rule of criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33525 - 2008-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS
the sentence. Id. Whether the defendant had a legitimate expectation of finality in a sentence is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88488 - 2012-10-22
the sentence. Id. Whether the defendant had a legitimate expectation of finality in a sentence is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88488 - 2012-10-22
Bryce L. Garrett v. Gerald Berge
. Id. at 399. We concluded that the attachment was not necessary because the conduct report itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6347 - 2005-03-31
. Id. at 399. We concluded that the attachment was not necessary because the conduct report itself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6347 - 2005-03-31
Rick Jackson v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Id. at 149. “Substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6135 - 2005-03-31
findings of fact if they are supported by substantial evidence in the record. Id. at 149. “Substantial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6135 - 2005-03-31
City of Sturgeon Bay v. Nathan W. Schley
argument that an objective test such as a field sobriety test was needed in this case is incorrect. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26214 - 2006-08-14
argument that an objective test such as a field sobriety test was needed in this case is incorrect. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26214 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claims and to raise them in their first § 974.06 motion.” Id. “If they don’t, the claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857223 - 2024-10-03
claims and to raise them in their first § 974.06 motion.” Id. “If they don’t, the claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857223 - 2024-10-03
State v. Ronald L. Saari
literally at [the defendant’s] elbow at all times; nothing in the Fourth Amendment is to the contrary.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12227 - 2005-03-31
literally at [the defendant’s] elbow at all times; nothing in the Fourth Amendment is to the contrary.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12227 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rubin E. Ards
we will uphold its exercise of discretion. Id. at 681. The time elapsed from the event or condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
we will uphold its exercise of discretion. Id. at 681. The time elapsed from the event or condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12