Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30471 - 30480 of 69083 for as he.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
—that Hopson sexually assaulted her. The victim testified that he did so on three occasions: once each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=474643 - 2022-01-19

[PDF] NOTICE
appeals a circuit-court order denying his motion to modify child support. He claims that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30147 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
. STAT. § 346.63. He argues that the State violated his right to be free from unreasonable seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38160 - 2014-09-15

Stephen Boudwin v. Windjammers Sailing Club, Inc.
. The town supervisor, Patrick Chambers, testified concerning the events leading to the present dispute. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15398 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
law in Wisconsin in 1993. He is a criminal defense attorney from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104581 - 2013-11-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, or for other bonafide, nondiscriminatory business reason.” ¶8 At trial, Peterson argued that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103309 - 2013-10-23

[PDF] Michael A. Downey v. John P. Kendall
acquired title to the building but secured the loan with Eighty Fourth assets. He leased the building
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9436 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Joseph Schultz
bar a nuisance. He argues that §§ 823.09 and 823.10, STATS., unconstitutionally violate his federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13300 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Melvin H. Van Zeeland
. Doris had been baby-sitting at Bruce's for a "couple of days," but Langenberg did not recall if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14504 - 2017-09-21

WI App 6 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2535-CR Complete Title ...
, sentence modification. He argues that the circuit court erroneously interpreted and applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131811 - 2015-03-11