Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30471 - 30480 of 64843 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 30471 - 30480 of 64843 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142821 - 2017-09-21
review of the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142821 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the witness’s testimony. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214073 - 2018-06-07
the witness’s testimony. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214073 - 2018-06-07
State v. Robert J. Pettis
the plea colloquy record. Having had an adequate plea colloquy, Pettis cannot show a manifest injustice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12578 - 2005-03-31
the plea colloquy record. Having had an adequate plea colloquy, Pettis cannot show a manifest injustice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12578 - 2005-03-31
95 CV 784 Robert Garel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
11. ¶4 After reviewing the files, briefs and written arguments in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15454 - 2005-03-31
11. ¶4 After reviewing the files, briefs and written arguments in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15454 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s order if the record supports the result irrespective of the court’s rationale). ¶5 A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31343 - 2008-01-07
court’s order if the record supports the result irrespective of the court’s rationale). ¶5 A new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31343 - 2008-01-07
State v. Keith Edward Cooper
pointed out in denying the motion to withdraw the no contest plea, the record belies this argument. Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8217 - 2005-03-31
pointed out in denying the motion to withdraw the no contest plea, the record belies this argument. Prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8217 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the untimely answer should not be imputed to Armbrust. First, nothing in the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32778 - 2014-09-15
the untimely answer should not be imputed to Armbrust. First, nothing in the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32778 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court,” and “portions of the record essential to an understanding of the issues raised, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66225 - 2014-09-15
of the trial court,” and “portions of the record essential to an understanding of the issues raised, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66225 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Pettis
are as able as the postconviction court to review the plea colloquy record. Having had an adequate plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12578 - 2017-09-21
are as able as the postconviction court to review the plea colloquy record. Having had an adequate plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12578 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
“motion for reconsideration following a motion for summary judgment.” The Record shows that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69199 - 2011-08-08
“motion for reconsideration following a motion for summary judgment.” The Record shows that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69199 - 2011-08-08