Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30481 - 30490 of 77801 for restraining order.

State v. Gary Klatt
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Marinette County: CHARLES D. HEATH, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11353 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 120
. According to the plea agreement, Attorney Hughes agreed to pay restitution as ordered by the federal court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34283 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Charlotte Gadzinski v. Gerald Gadzinski
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Trempealeau County: ALAN S. ROBERTSON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8447 - 2017-09-19

WI 98 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Notice This order is subject to further editing and...
2011 WI 98 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Notice This order is subject to further
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73817 - 2011-11-10

[PDF] County of Walworth v. James E. O'Donnell
[of] the conviction.” O’Donnell appealed. In an unpublished order dated May 9, 1997, this court ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12350 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Donald M. Petersilka
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Door County: JOHN D. KOEHN, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15700 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. APPEAL from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Wood County: GREGORY J. POTTER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36189 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Robert Garel
. ROBERT GAREL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13391 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Melissa Ertz Rogge v. Paul Aaron Rogge
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County: DALE T. PASELL, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5976 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] The Trustee of the Ronald Zuelsdorf and Patricia Zuelsdorf Family Living Trust v. Andrew Hetzel
and ordered any prohibited landscaping removed and the property restored. Zuelsdorf argues that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6640 - 2017-09-20