Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30491 - 30500 of 52769 for address.
Search results 30491 - 30500 of 52769 for address.
State v. Ronald L. Baskin
a sentence modification is addressed to the trial court’s discretion. See id. ANALYSIS ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15891 - 2005-03-31
a sentence modification is addressed to the trial court’s discretion. See id. ANALYSIS ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15891 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dale H. Krause
for obstructing an officer contrary to Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1) and from a postconviction order addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15958 - 2005-03-31
for obstructing an officer contrary to Wis. Stat. § 946.41(1) and from a postconviction order addressing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15958 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. The no-merit report addresses the potential issues of whether Canfield’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132113 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion. The no-merit report addresses the potential issues of whether Canfield’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132113 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Talib Amin Akbar
to present his own defense. For example, he stated "I would like to address the Court based upon my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8862 - 2017-09-19
to present his own defense. For example, he stated "I would like to address the Court based upon my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8862 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and to address the circuit court prior to sentencing. The court considered the standard sentencing factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=686136 - 2023-08-03
and to address the circuit court prior to sentencing. The court considered the standard sentencing factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=686136 - 2023-08-03
State v. James L. Creamer
they were already raised and addressed in his prior appeal. The trial court properly denied Creamer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15401 - 2005-03-31
they were already raised and addressed in his prior appeal. The trial court properly denied Creamer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15401 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) (noting that the clear majority of jurisdictions addressing the issue make no distinction between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133096 - 2015-01-20
) (noting that the clear majority of jurisdictions addressing the issue make no distinction between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133096 - 2015-01-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 769 N.W.2d 82. However, we feel compelled to address the circuit court’s apparent belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106030 - 2017-09-21
, 769 N.W.2d 82. However, we feel compelled to address the circuit court’s apparent belief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106030 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to show that he posted the surety bond. ¶4 On appeal, this court need not address arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165189 - 2017-09-21
failed to show that he posted the surety bond. ¶4 On appeal, this court need not address arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165189 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
), aff’d, 486 U.S. 429 (1988). The no-merit report addresses the validity of the sentence imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172301 - 2017-09-21
), aff’d, 486 U.S. 429 (1988). The no-merit report addresses the validity of the sentence imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172301 - 2017-09-21