Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30491 - 30500 of 42953 for t o.

[PDF] NOTICE
-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: FRANCIS T. WASIELEWSKI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32538 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
reached the same conclusion as we do, that is, “[t]he plea colloquy was adequate and shows the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40232 - 2009-08-31

State v. Dorian H.
jurisdiction.[3] As may be seen, the court is to consider, among (many) other things, "[t]he adequacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9277 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bryan L. Lopez
.” Pickens v. State, 96 Wis. 2d 549, 556, 292 N.W.2d 601 (1980). “[T]he trial court must be given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4889 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
: MICHAEL T. JUDGE, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34566 - 2008-11-11

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 8, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422646 - 2021-09-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
explained by the State: [t]he charges were based on multiple acts constituting parts of a common scheme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206034 - 2017-12-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
stated “[t]his sounds like it was certainly disorderly conduct. 90 days maximum, a thousand dollars
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149443 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(footnote omitted). Lasanske held that “[t]here is a difference in the procedure for applying penalty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125310 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] SC Clerk-Ltr
: www.wicourts.gov Sheila T. Reiff Clerk of Supreme Court WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT MONTHLY STATISTICAL
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345725 - 2021-03-10