Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3051 - 3060 of 45165 for Cost-effective.
Search results 3051 - 3060 of 45165 for Cost-effective.
[PDF]
John L. Gorton v. Hostak
to the plaintiffs and that each plaintiff is also entitled to $100 for attorney fees as a statutory item of costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17159 - 2017-09-21
to the plaintiffs and that each plaintiff is also entitled to $100 for attorney fees as a statutory item of costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17159 - 2017-09-21
John L. Gorton v. Hostak
as a statutory item of costs. Additionally, the circuit court denied the plaintiffs' request for an award
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17159 - 2005-03-31
as a statutory item of costs. Additionally, the circuit court denied the plaintiffs' request for an award
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17159 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 17
no “practical effect” on the collateral consequences—in this case, the firearms ban and the cost of care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630177 - 2023-05-23
no “practical effect” on the collateral consequences—in this case, the firearms ban and the cost of care
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=630177 - 2023-05-23
Theresa Dittberner v. Windsor Sanitary District Number 1
the businesses to an existing line, appeared to the commission to be the most cost-effective because it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10607 - 2005-03-31
the businesses to an existing line, appeared to the commission to be the most cost-effective because it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10607 - 2005-03-31
Paul D. Atkinson v. Donald D. Mentzel
court should have assessed costs against Atkinson for filing a frivolous defense. We reject both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10259 - 2005-03-31
court should have assessed costs against Atkinson for filing a frivolous defense. We reject both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10259 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Suzanne Schultz v. Barbara Trascher
Trascher to remove part of the fence she had erected. The trial court also ordered Schultz to pay costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3306 - 2017-09-19
Trascher to remove part of the fence she had erected. The trial court also ordered Schultz to pay costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3306 - 2017-09-19
Suzanne Schultz v. Barbara Trascher
also ordered Schultz to pay costs associated with removal of the fence, but found that Schultz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3306 - 2005-03-31
also ordered Schultz to pay costs associated with removal of the fence, but found that Schultz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3306 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Theresa Dittberner v. Windsor Sanitary District Number 1
line, appeared to the commission to be the most cost-effective because it would extend service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10607 - 2017-09-20
line, appeared to the commission to be the most cost-effective because it would extend service
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10607 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Paul D. Atkinson v. Donald D. Mentzel
further contends that the trial court should have assessed costs against Atkinson for filing a frivolous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10259 - 2017-09-20
further contends that the trial court should have assessed costs against Atkinson for filing a frivolous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10259 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Core competencies guide: Adult DCPI trainings
PROCESS Serves as effective consumer by seeking cost efficient services for drug court participants
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/corecompguide.pdf - 2021-09-23
PROCESS Serves as effective consumer by seeking cost efficient services for drug court participants
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/corecompguide.pdf - 2021-09-23