Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3051 - 3060 of 29547 for er.
Search results 3051 - 3060 of 29547 for er.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial brief constitutes “newly discovered evidence”; and (4) that the circuit court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118300 - 2014-09-15
trial brief constitutes “newly discovered evidence”; and (4) that the circuit court erred in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118300 - 2014-09-15
Ronald A. Arthur v. Randy Keefe
this appeal. He contends that the trial court erred by trying Doyle’s claim before resolving this action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14214 - 2005-03-31
this appeal. He contends that the trial court erred by trying Doyle’s claim before resolving this action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14214 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David T. Hall
erred when it concluded that he did not establish the existence of a new factor warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19622 - 2017-09-21
erred when it concluded that he did not establish the existence of a new factor warranting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19622 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice; and (3) the circuit court clerk erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324286 - 2021-01-20
) he is entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice; and (3) the circuit court clerk erred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324286 - 2021-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and reconfinement decision. And, Hardaway does not argue that the circuit court erred by not bringing up
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271533 - 2020-07-23
and reconfinement decision. And, Hardaway does not argue that the circuit court erred by not bringing up
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271533 - 2020-07-23
s. Tony Merriweather v. Gerald Berge
).[1] Consequently, the only issue that is properly before this court is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6855 - 2005-03-31
).[1] Consequently, the only issue that is properly before this court is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6855 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Knapp
of the original sentence. Knapp argues that the court erred in sentencing him by placing undue weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19
of the original sentence. Knapp argues that the court erred in sentencing him by placing undue weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9262 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
, we rejected Kellam’s argument that the circuit court erred when it refused to suppress either
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96942 - 2013-05-14
, we rejected Kellam’s argument that the circuit court erred when it refused to suppress either
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96942 - 2013-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. Shellie argues that the circuit court erred when it resentenced him after his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801441 - 2024-05-15
for postconviction relief. Shellie argues that the circuit court erred when it resentenced him after his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801441 - 2024-05-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” The “[f]ailure to file a respondent’s brief tacitly concedes that the [circuit] court erred,” State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745781 - 2023-12-29
.” The “[f]ailure to file a respondent’s brief tacitly concedes that the [circuit] court erred,” State ex
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745781 - 2023-12-29