Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3051 - 3060 of 83771 for simple case search/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
appellate case: “An easement may not ripen into fee simple ownership, even after years of use.” See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2014-08-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in an Indiana appellate case: “An easement may not ripen into fee simple ownership, even after years of use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118853 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kenneth Golden
. In that case, the trial court had explained to the defendant the repeater nature of the charge without having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12905 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
consecutive to a sentence he was serving in connection with a conviction in a Dane County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671289 - 2023-06-28

[PDF] State v. Joseph J.J.
N.W.2d 651, 653 (1979). With this law in place, we now turn to the facts of this case. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10814 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Young’s argument is reduced to a simple one. Specifically, he argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206894 - 2018-01-11

[PDF] NOTICE
. In any case, apart from their argument that we should adopt the standard applied in Maryland Arms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41677 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
that this case involved “plain factual and legal issues” and a “relatively simple trial…[with] straightforward
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41677 - 2009-09-30

State v. Matrice L.R.
its decision. We reject Matrice’s claim for the simple reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12414 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
631 (Ct. App. 1994) (highlighting that a simple and direct question to the defendant during the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92118 - 2014-09-15