Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30501 - 30510 of 98490 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30501 - 30510 of 98490 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
no reason to disturb the trial court’s findings in this case. ¶11 Based on the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77606 - 2012-02-06
no reason to disturb the trial court’s findings in this case. ¶11 Based on the trial court’s findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77606 - 2012-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court conceded that the case “may have had a different outcome if this lawsuit had been brought … back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79063 - 2012-03-05
. The court conceded that the case “may have had a different outcome if this lawsuit had been brought … back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79063 - 2012-03-05
COURT OF APPEALS
that case would proceed through the court system. He knew what would have to be proven in order for him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36870 - 2009-06-22
that case would proceed through the court system. He knew what would have to be proven in order for him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36870 - 2009-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 25, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72852 - 2011-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 25, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72852 - 2011-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
sent a question to the court asking: “[W]ho initiated the charges in this case?” It is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2011-11-22
sent a question to the court asking: “[W]ho initiated the charges in this case?” It is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2011-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
court properly applied the summary judgment methodology to this case. ¶7 At the outset we note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91100 - 2013-01-02
court properly applied the summary judgment methodology to this case. ¶7 At the outset we note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91100 - 2013-01-02
COURT OF APPEALS
that the company president knew of the pheasant hunting trip. Id. at 474. The court acknowledged cases from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112739 - 2014-05-21
that the company president knew of the pheasant hunting trip. Id. at 474. The court acknowledged cases from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112739 - 2014-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court noted that if Edwards could not pay the change-of-venue fees “up front,” the case would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86384 - 2012-08-22
court noted that if Edwards could not pay the change-of-venue fees “up front,” the case would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86384 - 2012-08-22
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismiss the case; the circuit court did so. Green Tree then asked this court to dismiss the pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103484 - 2013-10-28
and dismiss the case; the circuit court did so. Green Tree then asked this court to dismiss the pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103484 - 2013-10-28
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 30, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86552 - 2012-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 30, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86552 - 2012-08-29