Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30501 - 30510 of 68826 for e j h.

[PDF] Wisconsin Power and Light Company v. Langlade County Board of Adjustment
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Langlade County: ROBERT E. KINNEY, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8922 - 2017-09-19

Wisconsin Power and Light Company v. Langlade County Board of Adjustment
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Langlade County: ROBERT E. KINNEY, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8922 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2019-20). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610816 - 2023-01-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Hagedorn, JJ. No. 2014AP2781 2 ¶1 HAGEDORN, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191580 - 2017-09-21

Jerome Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
of Appeals. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and cause remanded. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. Jerome
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17039 - 2005-03-31

00-CV-3379 Dotty Dumpling's Dowry, Ltd. v. Community Development Authority of the City of Madison
. ¶1 DEININGER, J. Dotty Dumpling’s Dowry, Ltd. (Dotty), appeals an order granting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4191 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 00-CV-3379 Dotty Dumpling's Dowry, Ltd. v. Community Development Authority of the City of Madison
, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, P.J., Deininger and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 DEININGER, J. Dotty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4191 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Ronald A. Keith, Sr. v. State
. § 51.61(1)(e) and WIS. ADMIN. CODE § HFS 94.07(1) guarantee an inmate the right to the least restrictive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2245 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Jerome Hoepker v. City of Madison Plan Commission
, reversed in part, and cause remanded. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. Jerome and Jane Hoepker (collectively
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17039 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. Mandelman
by counsel, in violation of SCR 20:1.8(h).6 ¶27 Another client matter detailed in the OLR's complaint
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25168 - 2017-09-21