Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30501 - 30510 of 46942 for shows.

[PDF] NOTICE
(1)(a)2. may be satisfied by showing “that there is a substantial likelihood, based on the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60234 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Sara V.
to show how Sara was harassed by other students. They claimed that Sara suffered from depression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9654 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
back into the community with some extended supervision thereafter.” ¶7 The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33530 - 2008-07-30

COURT OF APPEALS
reliability, “a deficiency in one [consideration] may be compensated for … by a strong showing as to the other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104482 - 2013-11-19

COURT OF APPEALS
commitment order, the County need only show there is “a substantial likelihood, based on the subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46612 - 2010-02-01

[PDF] NOTICE
, in order to demonstrate a misuse of discretion, a defendant must show that the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26847 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Robert Goree v. Stella Love
. In re Ryde, 76 Wis.2d 558, 563, 251 N.W.2d 791, 793 (1977). In this case the record shows only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12688 - 2017-09-21

State v. Dennis R. Hyland
. The court also determined there was no particularized showing of prejudice in terms of ability to present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5237 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. A statement showing how the issues sought to be raised differ from issues raised and previously adjudicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89598 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Pettis
colloquy, Pettis cannot show a manifest injustice requiring withdrawal of the pleas. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12578 - 2017-09-21