Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30521 - 30530 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 30521 - 30530 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Robert B. Ciarpaglini v. Kelly Flury
that no further motions or other pleadings be filed pending Ciarpaglini’s compliance with its order. On April
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10723 - 2017-09-20
that no further motions or other pleadings be filed pending Ciarpaglini’s compliance with its order. On April
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10723 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in possession of a firearm. He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
in possession of a firearm. He also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=985859 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
Robert Robinson v. City of Milwaukee
court’s order of February 18, 2004, denying his motion to reconsider the trial court’s January 9, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20
court’s order of February 18, 2004, denying his motion to reconsider the trial court’s January 9, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.23(3). Edward Cole appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248804 - 2019-10-23
. RULE 809.23(3). Edward Cole appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for a new trial. Based
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248804 - 2019-10-23
State v. Adam J. Kestell
as possession of drug paraphernalia. Kestell pled not guilty to both counts. He filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7627 - 2005-03-31
as possession of drug paraphernalia. Kestell pled not guilty to both counts. He filed a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7627 - 2005-03-31
Teresa L. v. Sauk County
its motion for relief from judgment, §§ 805.15(3) and 806.07, Stats., and that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7905 - 2005-03-31
its motion for relief from judgment, §§ 805.15(3) and 806.07, Stats., and that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7905 - 2005-03-31
Teresa L. v. Sauk County
its motion for relief from judgment, §§ 805.15(3) and 806.07, Stats., and that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8100 - 2005-03-31
its motion for relief from judgment, §§ 805.15(3) and 806.07, Stats., and that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8100 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the motion and filed its own affidavit, which did not directly refute Bennett’s representation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232585 - 2019-01-16
the motion and filed its own affidavit, which did not directly refute Bennett’s representation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232585 - 2019-01-16
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Stahl
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Among other things, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Among other things, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21
Robert Robinson v. City of Milwaukee
court’s order of February 18, 2004, denying his motion to reconsider the trial court’s January 9, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7343 - 2005-03-31
court’s order of February 18, 2004, denying his motion to reconsider the trial court’s January 9, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7343 - 2005-03-31