Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30521 - 30530 of 62407 for child support.
Search results 30521 - 30530 of 62407 for child support.
CA Blank Order
. The court determined that the first search warrant was supported by probable cause as follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110863 - 2014-04-29
. The court determined that the first search warrant was supported by probable cause as follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110863 - 2014-04-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that would support a motion to modify Pearson’s sentence. Counsel explains that he has found no factual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219642 - 2018-09-20
that would support a motion to modify Pearson’s sentence. Counsel explains that he has found no factual
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219642 - 2018-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the landlord was unable to meet his burden, which included his burden for supporting those alleged costs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161636 - 2017-09-21
that the landlord was unable to meet his burden, which included his burden for supporting those alleged costs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161636 - 2017-09-21
Milwaukee County v. Jacqualine S. W.
). Jacqualine contends: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the finding that she was dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4946 - 2005-03-31
). Jacqualine contends: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the finding that she was dangerous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4946 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert F. Pagac
not allege continuing criminal activity and was not sufficiently reliable to support a finding of probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4997 - 2005-03-31
not allege continuing criminal activity and was not sufficiently reliable to support a finding of probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4997 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Jagusch
was insufficient to support his conviction for attempted mayhem. Because Jagusch failed to preserve trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2099 - 2005-03-31
was insufficient to support his conviction for attempted mayhem. Because Jagusch failed to preserve trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2099 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
because the evidence supports application of the doctrine of inevitable discovery. Under that doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37636 - 2014-09-15
because the evidence supports application of the doctrine of inevitable discovery. Under that doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37636 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stop was supported by reasonable suspicion, and the denial of the suppression motion was proper, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905105 - 2025-01-28
stop was supported by reasonable suspicion, and the denial of the suppression motion was proper, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905105 - 2025-01-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not supported by reasonable suspicion. We disagree and affirm the judgment. ¶2 On June 28, 2008, State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46582 - 2014-09-15
was not supported by reasonable suspicion. We disagree and affirm the judgment. ¶2 On June 28, 2008, State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46582 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an affidavit in support of his motion, contending he was not aware an attorney could identify defenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63388 - 2014-09-15
an affidavit in support of his motion, contending he was not aware an attorney could identify defenses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63388 - 2014-09-15