Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30521 - 30530 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 30521 - 30530 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Karnitz did move to suppress certain inculpatory statements he made to police. However, he elected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133052 - 2017-09-21
Karnitz did move to suppress certain inculpatory statements he made to police. However, he elected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133052 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William R. Peterson
by acknowledging that this court had accepted the videotape operator’s statement regarding the accuracy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14985 - 2017-09-21
by acknowledging that this court had accepted the videotape operator’s statement regarding the accuracy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14985 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark T. Smith
and hearsay objections to the CAD report. Smith invites this court to conclude that Rose Smith’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21029 - 2006-01-23
and hearsay objections to the CAD report. Smith invites this court to conclude that Rose Smith’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21029 - 2006-01-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the State told the jury in opening statement that the case began because police were responding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
, the State told the jury in opening statement that the case began because police were responding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the State told the jury in opening statement that the case began because police were responding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
, the State told the jury in opening statement that the case began because police were responding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the murder. These hearsay statements were submitted by Nicholson as claimed “corroboration” of Walker’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265349 - 2020-06-24
in the murder. These hearsay statements were submitted by Nicholson as claimed “corroboration” of Walker’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265349 - 2020-06-24
[PDF]
Patricia A.M. v. Patricia S.
to a prior statement that Patricia was “controlling,” and that her appointment would violate Hugh’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3212 - 2017-09-19
to a prior statement that Patricia was “controlling,” and that her appointment would violate Hugh’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3212 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Gary E. Waters
at the postconviction hearing that the poem was admissible as a prior consistent statement as allowed by WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5753 - 2017-09-19
at the postconviction hearing that the poem was admissible as a prior consistent statement as allowed by WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5753 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Garrity
acknowledged that he initialed the statement on the guilty plea questionnaire indicating he did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9397 - 2017-09-19
acknowledged that he initialed the statement on the guilty plea questionnaire indicating he did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9397 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Dodge v. Bryan E. Harned
court disagreed, as do we. Immediately following its statement of the rule we have just quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10251 - 2017-09-20
court disagreed, as do we. Immediately following its statement of the rule we have just quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10251 - 2017-09-20