Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30521 - 30530 of 65192 for or b.
Search results 30521 - 30530 of 65192 for or b.
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59637 - 2011-02-02
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59637 - 2011-02-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
. WIS. STAT. § 767.61(3)(a), (b), and (d). ¶9 Scott argues the court abused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36288 - 2014-09-15
. WIS. STAT. § 767.61(3)(a), (b), and (d). ¶9 Scott argues the court abused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36288 - 2014-09-15
State v. Kelly K. Koopmans
shall be present: (a) At the arraignment; (b) At trial; (c) At all proceedings when the jury is being
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17017 - 2005-03-31
shall be present: (a) At the arraignment; (b) At trial; (c) At all proceedings when the jury is being
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17017 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. §§ 943.32(2) (amended Feb. 1, 2003); 939.50(1)(c) and (3)(c) (amended Feb. 1, 2003); 973.01(2)(b)3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27307 - 2014-09-15
. §§ 943.32(2) (amended Feb. 1, 2003); 939.50(1)(c) and (3)(c) (amended Feb. 1, 2003); 973.01(2)(b)3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27307 - 2014-09-15
State v. Tammy L. Beier
Beier was charged with violating Wis. Stat. § 948.03(4)(b) (1999-2000),[1] which provides: A person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3753 - 2005-03-31
Beier was charged with violating Wis. Stat. § 948.03(4)(b) (1999-2000),[1] which provides: A person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3753 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
time.” In addition, the court stated: [B]ut the third reason, ultimately the reason that we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57625 - 2014-09-15
time.” In addition, the court stated: [B]ut the third reason, ultimately the reason that we have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57625 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial. Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶26. “‘[B]oth the performance and prejudice components … are mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30085 - 2007-08-27
was prejudicial. Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶26. “‘[B]oth the performance and prejudice components … are mixed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30085 - 2007-08-27
Patricia Ann Johnson v. Bruce Hinton Johnson
: HENRY B. BUSLEE so indicate) JUDGES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8442 - 2005-03-31
: HENRY B. BUSLEE so indicate) JUDGES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8442 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Hindsley, 2000 WI App 130, ¶22, 237 Wis. 2d 358, 614 N.W.2d 48. B. Reasonable Suspicion to Support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162514 - 2017-09-21
. Hindsley, 2000 WI App 130, ¶22, 237 Wis. 2d 358, 614 N.W.2d 48. B. Reasonable Suspicion to Support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Curtis D. Ader
, I guess. [B]ased upon … relevancy grounds, I’m going to exclude [the testimony]; that is, its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6486 - 2017-09-19
, I guess. [B]ased upon … relevancy grounds, I’m going to exclude [the testimony]; that is, its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6486 - 2017-09-19