Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30521 - 30530 of 63602 for records.
Search results 30521 - 30530 of 63602 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the Record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717718 - 2023-10-25
and an independent review of the Record, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717718 - 2023-10-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138408 - 2017-09-21
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138408 - 2017-09-21
State v. Rubin E. Ards
for trial. However, in a hearing on the matter the State introduced evidence of recorded telephone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
for trial. However, in a hearing on the matter the State introduced evidence of recorded telephone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the no-merit report, our No. 2017AP525-CRNM 2 independent review of the record revealed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214778 - 2018-06-26
in the no-merit report, our No. 2017AP525-CRNM 2 independent review of the record revealed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214778 - 2018-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
plea was coerced. We concluded that the record did not support his assertion that he entered the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30065 - 2007-08-27
plea was coerced. We concluded that the record did not support his assertion that he entered the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30065 - 2007-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131447 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131447 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252405 - 2020-01-10
. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the records, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252405 - 2020-01-10
COURT OF APPEALS
Devinney to supplement the record with an affidavit. Devinney’s affidavit stated Young did not represent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26653 - 2006-10-02
Devinney to supplement the record with an affidavit. Devinney’s affidavit stated Young did not represent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26653 - 2006-10-02
State v. Samuel J.G.
on the criteria listed in § 48.18(5), Stats., and the court must set forth in the record specific findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10742 - 2005-03-31
on the criteria listed in § 48.18(5), Stats., and the court must set forth in the record specific findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10742 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is not part of the record on appeal. Generally, we will not consider an issue raised for the first time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32209 - 2008-03-24
is not part of the record on appeal. Generally, we will not consider an issue raised for the first time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32209 - 2008-03-24