Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30531 - 30540 of 51893 for him.

City of Milwaukee v. Sammie L. Glass
of property seized from him by the Milwaukee Police Department. The plaintiff's petition for the return
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17547 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jason R. Sigmon
requirements as to a charge against him that included the element of sexual contact. We concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21071 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. John W. Campbell
of probation requiring him to reimburse Walworth County for the costs of his appointed “standby counsel
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18001 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Thomas L. Stafford
destroyed an audio recording of the contact between Rose and him, which he claimed contained exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4995 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
to coerce, intimidate, or harass other patients. Access also may allow him to coerce, intimidate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew O. Olaiya
with respect to this client's case. He also failed to timely respond to a letter the Board staff sent to him
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16454 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Carlton B. Campbell
failed to inform him of the extent of the punishment at the time he pleaded to the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9503 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] James V. Holschbach v. Washington Park Manor
to regain his footing, his ankle popped, causing him severe pain. The fall seriously injured him. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7518 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jason C. Kinstler
JJ. FRANKEL, J. Jason Kinstler appeals from a judgment convicting him of fourth-degree sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13094 - 2017-09-21

State v. Bobby G. Grant
him that a verdict in a criminal jury trial must be unanimous. We disagree and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14340 - 2005-03-31