Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30541 - 30550 of 74557 for public records.

COURT OF APPEALS
was wearing. One of the police officers, Officer Dean Baldukas, later testified, and a video recording also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93381 - 2013-02-27

James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
.” Robertson Transp. Co. v. Public Serv. Comm’n, 39 Wis.2d 653, 658, 159 N.W.2d 636, 638 (1968). The ALJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13175 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James S. Cook v. David H. Schwarz
of record, did not testify at the hearing. Nos. 97-3092 97-3093 97-3094 3 sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13176 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
of his vehicle, pounding on the vehicle, and causing a scene in a public area. Although a certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82078 - 2012-05-08

[PDF] State v. Terrence Madison
, the record is replete with evidence of Madison’s drug trafficking, so much so that we easily conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6239 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Catalytic Combustion Corporation v. Vapor Extraction Technology, Inc.
in California or Colorado. Although the record suggests otherwise, the geographic location of the contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2270 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
offends public policy and is not enforceable. See Frisch v. Henrichs, 2007 WI 102, ¶67, 304 Wis. 2d 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133045 - 2015-01-20

COURT OF APPEALS
, 270 Wis. 2d 585, 678 N.W.2d 220. It also bears on the need to protect the public. The prosecution’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32501 - 2008-04-22

Vernon Seay v. Wisconsin Personnel Commission
that he never had a poor relationship with his colleagues, there is substantial evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8777 - 2005-03-31

State v. John B. Young
the facts of record constitute probable cause is a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4402 - 2005-03-31