Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30541 - 30550 of 46941 for shows.
Search results 30541 - 30550 of 46941 for shows.
Certification
a child for more than 12 hours” supported his interpretation because it “shows that the legislature
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73854 - 2011-11-15
a child for more than 12 hours” supported his interpretation because it “shows that the legislature
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73854 - 2011-11-15
State v. Gale Johnson
of a motion for a mistrial will be reversed only on a clear showing of an erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15677 - 2005-03-31
of a motion for a mistrial will be reversed only on a clear showing of an erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15677 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John A. Rupp
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence complained of. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2810 - 2017-09-19
must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence complained of. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2810 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Melvina Young v. John S. Wright
. At trial, the appellants presented evidence that Wright broke appointments to show apartments to Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10661 - 2017-09-20
. At trial, the appellants presented evidence that Wright broke appointments to show apartments to Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10661 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to show that he knew Cameron had a gun. ¶6 Even when more than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138469 - 2017-09-21
that there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to show that he knew Cameron had a gun. ¶6 Even when more than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138469 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Scott E. Selmer
of this proceeding. If the costs are not paid within the time specified, and absent a showing to this court of his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18715 - 2017-09-21
of this proceeding. If the costs are not paid within the time specified, and absent a showing to this court of his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18715 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James W. Bannen
of this proceeding in the amount of $3875.63. If the costs are not paid within 60 days, and absent a showing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16565 - 2017-09-21
of this proceeding in the amount of $3875.63. If the costs are not paid within 60 days, and absent a showing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16565 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in original). ¶10 Here, though, Lee does not show that counsel failed to raise arguably meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62656 - 2014-09-15
in original). ¶10 Here, though, Lee does not show that counsel failed to raise arguably meritorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62656 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no transcripts apparently exist, the court’s minutes show the doctors’ reports were admitted without objection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=443292 - 2021-10-19
no transcripts apparently exist, the court’s minutes show the doctors’ reports were admitted without objection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=443292 - 2021-10-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles J. Reed
is not deemed to refuse the test if the preponderance of the evidence shows that “the refusal was due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12896 - 2017-09-21
is not deemed to refuse the test if the preponderance of the evidence shows that “the refusal was due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12896 - 2017-09-21