Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30541 - 30550 of 43162 for t o.
Search results 30541 - 30550 of 43162 for t o.
Tamara R. DeVares v. Barney W. DeVares
or physical placement order. “[T]he trend in Wisconsin and elsewhere [is] to make modification of custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14722 - 2005-03-31
or physical placement order. “[T]he trend in Wisconsin and elsewhere [is] to make modification of custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14722 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the officer testified that, after his squad car pulled behind Restad’s vehicle at a stoplight, “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05
, the officer testified that, after his squad car pulled behind Restad’s vehicle at a stoplight, “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=992751 - 2025-08-05
State v. Rueben Gantt
, stating that "[t]he evidence clearly shows that defendant neglected and refused to support his children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9642 - 2005-03-31
, stating that "[t]he evidence clearly shows that defendant neglected and refused to support his children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9642 - 2005-03-31
State v. John A. Gatt
court for Rock County: RICHARD T. WERNER, Judge. Affirmed. VERGERONT, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13938 - 2005-03-31
court for Rock County: RICHARD T. WERNER, Judge. Affirmed. VERGERONT, J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13938 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael P. Schoenberg
the influence of an intoxicant as defined by these Instructions ….” [T]he use of the word “may,” coupled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15610 - 2017-09-21
the influence of an intoxicant as defined by these Instructions ….” [T]he use of the word “may,” coupled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15610 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Buckett
particularly, the trial court can consider the following: [T]he vicious or aggravated nature of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8020 - 2017-09-19
particularly, the trial court can consider the following: [T]he vicious or aggravated nature of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8020 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, including “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;” “[t]he judgment is void;” and “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194671 - 2017-09-21
, including “[m]istake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;” “[t]he judgment is void;” and “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194671 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and satisfactorily proved” and, as relevant to this case, if “[t]he party against whom enforcement is sought would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952585 - 2025-05-07
and satisfactorily proved” and, as relevant to this case, if “[t]he party against whom enforcement is sought would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=952585 - 2025-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the jury want to puke as well, and how is that not unfairly prejudicial against this defendant?” …“[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035873 - 2025-11-11
the jury want to puke as well, and how is that not unfairly prejudicial against this defendant?” …“[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1035873 - 2025-11-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
under Greenwold I. That contention was explicitly rejected in Greenwold II, 189 Wis. 2d at 68-69 (“[T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34358 - 2014-09-15
under Greenwold I. That contention was explicitly rejected in Greenwold II, 189 Wis. 2d at 68-69 (“[T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34358 - 2014-09-15