Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30551 - 30560 of 63782 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 30551 - 30560 of 63782 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and health care expenses. In response to a defense motion after verdict, the circuit court reduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175345 - 2017-09-21
and health care expenses. In response to a defense motion after verdict, the circuit court reduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175345 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Gramza
of conviction entered against him. He argues on appeal that the trial court erred when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19557 - 2017-09-21
of conviction entered against him. He argues on appeal that the trial court erred when it denied his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19557 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Stahl
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Among other things, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21
appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for sentence modification. Among other things, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Erik J. Moore
the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20243 - 2017-09-21
the judgment of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20243 - 2017-09-21
Robert Robinson v. City of Milwaukee
court’s order of February 18, 2004, denying his motion to reconsider the trial court’s January 9, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7343 - 2012-03-05
court’s order of February 18, 2004, denying his motion to reconsider the trial court’s January 9, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7343 - 2012-03-05
Milwaukee County v. Sylvia's Eagle Express, Inc.
. Stat. § 348.15(3)(c). Sylvia’s argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5599 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 348.15(3)(c). Sylvia’s argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5599 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and .249. He was also charged with obstructing an officer. His motion to suppress all evidence because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123440 - 2014-10-14
and .249. He was also charged with obstructing an officer. His motion to suppress all evidence because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123440 - 2014-10-14
City of Whitewater v. Elizabeth M. Neldner
. Before the trial court, she argued in a motion to suppress that if a person takes the test demanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15240 - 2005-03-31
. Before the trial court, she argued in a motion to suppress that if a person takes the test demanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15240 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
conference. The circuit court held a motion hearing and denied Vang’s motion, determining that Vang had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122272 - 2007-06-04
conference. The circuit court held a motion hearing and denied Vang’s motion, determining that Vang had
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122272 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
WI App 37
whether a debtor has stated counterclaims against a creditor that survive a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670926 - 2023-08-08
whether a debtor has stated counterclaims against a creditor that survive a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670926 - 2023-08-08