Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30551 - 30560 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30551 - 30560 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
completely disposed of the case at the circuit court level. Consequently, the Stubbes filed a notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88158 - 2012-10-15
completely disposed of the case at the circuit court level. Consequently, the Stubbes filed a notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88158 - 2012-10-15
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 14, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132848 - 2015-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 14, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132848 - 2015-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
the court grants the writ. In this case, the State properly asked for and received an extension[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
the court grants the writ. In this case, the State properly asked for and received an extension[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31050 - 2007-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
to fit this case within the Marquardt framework by emphasizing the circuit court’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2013-09-05
to fit this case within the Marquardt framework by emphasizing the circuit court’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46026 - 2013-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 14, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96744 - 2012-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 14, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96744 - 2012-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
have to become a witness in the case, which was already in the second day of trial.[5] The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76543 - 2012-01-17
have to become a witness in the case, which was already in the second day of trial.[5] The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76543 - 2012-01-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Because Pillman’s custody status does not ultimately depend on these disputed facts (as the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295139 - 2020-10-14
. Because Pillman’s custody status does not ultimately depend on these disputed facts (as the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295139 - 2020-10-14
2010 WI APP 132
2010 WI app 132 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP2831-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53658 - 2010-09-28
2010 WI app 132 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP2831-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53658 - 2010-09-28
[PDF]
WI APP 89
2009 WI APP 89 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1946
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36533 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 89 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1946
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36533 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 49
2011 WI APP 49 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2010AP582
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60745 - 2014-09-15
2011 WI APP 49 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2010AP582
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60745 - 2014-09-15