Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30571 - 30580 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] Brown County v. Matthew W.G.
§ 51.20, STATS. He claims the trial court failed to consider that his primary need was treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15929 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
., unpublished slip op. at 3. We rejected Johnson’s claim that Aviles’ identification testimony was not reliable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35558 - 2009-02-17

[PDF] John D. Hennick v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
Commission's decision that denied their claim for an income tax refund for taxes paid on income from a private
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9956 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770185 - 2024-03-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
argues that he became the prevailing party by virtue of Dane County’s dismissal of its claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94975 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dennis Taff v. Town of Burke
for water mains installed along their respective properties in the Taff Subdivision. They claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4045 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
). The record supports the circuit court’s decision. We normally decline to address claims of ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92657 - 2013-02-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of excessive taxes. An s. 74.35 claim has been denied by the town board. The relief sought by this action
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185277 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Susan Triggs
. Triggs claims that her trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to object to her six-person jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16024 - 2017-09-21

Carl Stevenson v. J. F. Brennan Company, Inc.
Stevenson appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his personal injury claim against J. F. Brennan Company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10438 - 2005-03-31