Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30571 - 30580 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.

COURT OF APPEALS
695 (Ct. App. 1998). That was not the case here. First, the statement came during the prosecutor’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145968 - 2015-08-10

[PDF] State v. Felipe Ayala
reasonably say that the prosecutor’s statements conflicted with “the uniform course of nature or with fully
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12018 - 2017-09-21

State v. James H. Bartz
not refuse to submit to a blood test. This court disagrees. Bartz’s unequivocal statement that he would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14329 - 2005-10-07

Richland School District v. Gerald Cummer
alleged in the statement of charges in fact took place." As a result, Kessler ordered Cummer's immediate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7885 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. There is an indication of psychological counseling; that would also be consistent. It is clear from this statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230814 - 2018-12-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the impression that Eisinger lost her job after the 2010 stipulated support revision. The misleading statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105211 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was not a substantial change in circumstances. Whatever may be said about the court’s prior statement in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66958 - 2014-09-15

State v. Marvell Clayton
to revocation but in light of the factors surrounding this, and in light of his admission and statement of need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25090 - 2006-05-08

State v. Gary T. Mork
statements and cross-examination of all the state’s witnesses.” He asserts that denial of access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5530 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Paul Piikkila v. Tim Loritz
to that money.” However, the court’s statement does not signify a misapplication of the statute’s standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6820 - 2017-09-20