Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30571 - 30580 of 58547 for speedy trial.

Carole H. Schmidt v. Waukesha State Bank
a declaratory judgment to Carole H. Schmidt, following a bench trial. The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9318 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rock County DHS v. Jessica L.
trial, but she does not suggest how a wrongful deprivation of a jury trial might exist independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20154 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Carole H. Schmidt v. Waukesha State Bank
judgment to Carole H. Schmidt, following a bench trial. The trial court concluded that the business note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9318 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Woody Howland v. BG Products, Inc.
Dealership Law (WFDL).1 Howland and Mendez argue that the trial court improperly granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15942 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, and an order denying his postconviction motions. Lee contends that he is entitled to a new trial because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94658 - 2013-03-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that O’Neal was entitled to a discharge trial, and the court subsequently held a bench trial on O’Neal’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=306803 - 2020-11-24

WI App 112 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP1789-CR Complete Titl...
stop of his vehicle by police. The trial court held that it was not a valid Terry[1] stop, mainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86921 - 2013-02-20

[PDF] WI App 5
, Inc. (collectively, “Phillips”) appeal the trial court’s order granting declaratory/summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90379 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 114
) of the statutes is amended to read: 804.01 (2) (c) Trial preparation: materials. 1. Subject to par. (d
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88989 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Everett W. Mosher
sexual contact with a person under sixteen. The trial court ruled he was not and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13349 - 2017-09-21