Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30581 - 30590 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
Search results 30581 - 30590 of 82614 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782997 - 2024-04-03
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782997 - 2024-04-03
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of foreclosure. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117164 - 2017-09-21
of foreclosure. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117164 - 2017-09-21
State v. Erik W. Parlow
to sustain a prima facie case that Parlow drove the vehicle, but that circumstantial evidence showed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14387 - 2005-03-31
to sustain a prima facie case that Parlow drove the vehicle, but that circumstantial evidence showed him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14387 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Village of Oregon v. Robyn R. Sunday
. § 971.31(10) for criminal cases does not apply in civil forfeiture actions, such as the one before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4305 - 2017-09-19
. § 971.31(10) for criminal cases does not apply in civil forfeiture actions, such as the one before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4305 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Charles L. Klaeser
of the chemical test results. He rests his argument on a line of cases which hold that a defendant’s driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12234 - 2017-09-21
of the chemical test results. He rests his argument on a line of cases which hold that a defendant’s driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12234 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
¶2 This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111336 - 2017-09-21
¶2 This is an eminent domain case involving a taking of .72 acres of property from Hoffer by DOT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111336 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Milenko Pavlovic v. Mladena Terzic
of the circuit court and remand the cause for a new trial. This case centers upon four checks which Pavlovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11350 - 2017-09-19
of the circuit court and remand the cause for a new trial. This case centers upon four checks which Pavlovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11350 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Paul Budney
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8883 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8883 - 2017-09-19
Doris M. Hoopingarner v. Town of Lakewood
of the case. See MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. State, 203 Wis. 2d 392, 400, 553 N.W.2d 284 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16279 - 2005-03-31
of the case. See MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. State, 203 Wis. 2d 392, 400, 553 N.W.2d 284 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Doris M. Hoopingarner v. Town of Lakewood
.” If the language of a statute is unambiguous, we merely apply the statute to the facts of the case. See MCI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16279 - 2017-09-21
.” If the language of a statute is unambiguous, we merely apply the statute to the facts of the case. See MCI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16279 - 2017-09-21