Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30581 - 30590 of 76656 for judgment for u s.

2007 WI APP 37
best interests. That is, however, a rebuttable presumption. …. Now Julie[’s] view as to what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27940 - 2007-03-27

F.M. Management Company Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
and policy judgments that require the expertise and experience of an agency, the agency’s decision, although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6574 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to believe that the person is violating or has violated s. 346.63(1) ... the officer, prior to an arrest, may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108909 - 2014-03-10

[PDF] F.M. Management Company Limited Partnership v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
in the application of the statute. In other words, when a legal question calls for value and policy judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6574 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Richard Austin
of alcohol … and whether the person was lawfully placed under arrest for violation of s. 346.63(1), (2m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7269 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
program under s. 938.538 or the adult intensive sanctions program under s. 301.048. (d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26894 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 136 S. Ct. 1181 (2016). The supreme court vacated our decision with respect to that issue. Upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189243 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
judgment in relation to them, the result of which is expressed in the will. Zelner v. Krueger, 83 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145363 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
, without prompting, to form a rational judgment in relation to them, the result of which is expressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145363 - 2015-07-29

State v. Richard Austin
under arrest for violation of s. 346.63(1), (2m) or (5) or a local ordinance in conformity therewith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7269 - 2005-03-31