Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Maurice D. Harris
as a repeater. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Harris contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5765 - 2005-03-31
as a repeater. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. Harris contends his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5765 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Storzer
denying his motion to modify the sentence based on new factors. He argues that the sentence is unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2393 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion to modify the sentence based on new factors. He argues that the sentence is unduly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2393 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion. We affirm. No. 2010AP3063-CR 2 ¶2 Turner first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83147 - 2014-09-15
and an order denying his postconviction motion. We affirm. No. 2010AP3063-CR 2 ¶2 Turner first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83147 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion to declare void an amended judgment of conviction entered July 14, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118164 - 2014-09-15
denying his motion to declare void an amended judgment of conviction entered July 14, 2011
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118164 - 2014-09-15
Naomi Anderson v. Con/Spec Corporation
in accordance with their contract. BE Architects moved for a new trial. The trial court denied all motions
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11651 - 2005-03-31
in accordance with their contract. BE Architects moved for a new trial. The trial court denied all motions
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11651 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Conry contends that the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97124 - 2013-05-21
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Conry contends that the circuit court erroneously exercised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97124 - 2013-05-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles D. Yoder
denying his § 974.06, STATS., motion for review of his sentence on a felony conviction. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8251 - 2017-09-19
denying his § 974.06, STATS., motion for review of his sentence on a felony conviction. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8251 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Town of Oconto v. Michael B. Frost
is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 1 We affirm the summary judgment. ¶2 In support of its motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20499 - 2017-09-21
is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 1 We affirm the summary judgment. ¶2 In support of its motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20499 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary Malkmus
BROWN, J.[1] Gary Malkmus appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3737 - 2005-03-31
BROWN, J.[1] Gary Malkmus appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3737 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court on that basis. In separate motions, the respondents move for a finding that this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015172 - 2025-09-25
the circuit court on that basis. In separate motions, the respondents move for a finding that this appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015172 - 2025-09-25