Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 62809 for child support.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 62809 for child support.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 The circuit court held that there was no reasonable suspicion to support field sobriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171154 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 The circuit court held that there was no reasonable suspicion to support field sobriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
common to support the requisite individualized suspicion” necessary to justify the investigative stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208752 - 2018-02-22
common to support the requisite individualized suspicion” necessary to justify the investigative stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208752 - 2018-02-22
State v. Alan W. Gursky
). We conclude that the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Gursky’s statement about being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13214 - 2005-03-31
). We conclude that the evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Gursky’s statement about being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13214 - 2005-03-31
Karin Palumbo v. Brian Kidder
not support the $120,000 figure and that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3945 - 2005-03-31
not support the $120,000 figure and that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3945 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
On December 8, 2010, the court granted the motion of Yasmine Clark to file a non-party amicus brief in support
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67837 - 2011-07-11
On December 8, 2010, the court granted the motion of Yasmine Clark to file a non-party amicus brief in support
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67837 - 2011-07-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In his direct appeal, Williams, by counsel, argued that insufficient evidence supported Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=518076 - 2022-05-05
. In his direct appeal, Williams, by counsel, argued that insufficient evidence supported Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=518076 - 2022-05-05
[PDF]
State v. George B. Gleason
contends there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that he made a “true threat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5236 - 2017-09-19
contends there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that he made a “true threat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5236 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
only determine whether the facts are sufficient to support the charged offense. See Broadie v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201775 - 2017-11-09
only determine whether the facts are sufficient to support the charged offense. See Broadie v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201775 - 2017-11-09
[PDF]
State v. Scott A. Defere
. ¶8 On appeal, Defere argues that the facts do not support an emergency rule exception to the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5941 - 2017-09-19
. ¶8 On appeal, Defere argues that the facts do not support an emergency rule exception to the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5941 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence to support the charge. Eirich also moved to suppress the evidence, challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130497 - 2017-09-21
evidence to support the charge. Eirich also moved to suppress the evidence, challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130497 - 2017-09-21