Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 98491 for civil court case status online.
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30981 - 2007-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30981 - 2007-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
does not include the finality statement and this court dismisses the appeal, it becomes law of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45004 - 2009-12-29
does not include the finality statement and this court dismisses the appeal, it becomes law of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45004 - 2009-12-29
COURT OF APPEALS
have no basis to reverse the disciplinary decision in this case, we affirm. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60366 - 2011-02-23
have no basis to reverse the disciplinary decision in this case, we affirm. By the Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60366 - 2011-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 5, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134443 - 2015-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 5, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134443 - 2015-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
occurred in this case and, thus, the trial court did not err in so ruling. B. Conspicuous. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30771 - 2007-11-05
occurred in this case and, thus, the trial court did not err in so ruling. B. Conspicuous. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30771 - 2007-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 23, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66393 - 2011-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 23, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66393 - 2011-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s discretionary decision based upon the particular facts of this case.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30618 - 2007-10-16
the circuit court’s discretionary decision based upon the particular facts of this case.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30618 - 2007-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case shows that defense counsel and the court explained the elements of the offense to Moore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35586 - 2009-02-18
in this case shows that defense counsel and the court explained the elements of the offense to Moore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35586 - 2009-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
whether a claim based on a statute is procedurally barred, this court reviews the case de novo. Minuteman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33191 - 2008-06-30
whether a claim based on a statute is procedurally barred, this court reviews the case de novo. Minuteman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33191 - 2008-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
.[5] Even if that were not the case, we are satisfied that the circuit court’s decision to award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100977 - 2013-08-20
.[5] Even if that were not the case, we are satisfied that the circuit court’s decision to award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100977 - 2013-08-20