Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 44749 for part.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 44749 for part.
State v. Dallas D. Lucas
Wisconsin Stat. § 973.20(13)(c) provides, in part: “If the defendant stipulates to the restitution claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7105 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Stat. § 973.20(13)(c) provides, in part: “If the defendant stipulates to the restitution claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7105 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
considered at sentencing during any part of the individual’s sentence or period of probation if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82636 - 2012-05-16
considered at sentencing during any part of the individual’s sentence or period of probation if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82636 - 2012-05-16
[PDF]
State v. Dexter Tolefree
he or she is aware as part of the original postconviction proceedings. At that point ... any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10564 - 2017-09-20
he or she is aware as part of the original postconviction proceedings. At that point ... any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10564 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James R. Arbuckle
of Ozaukee v. Quelle, 198 Wis. 2d 269, 280, 542 N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App. 1995), we formulated a three-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4795 - 2017-09-20
of Ozaukee v. Quelle, 198 Wis. 2d 269, 280, 542 N.W.2d 196 (Ct. App. 1995), we formulated a three-part test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4795 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the controls.” Counsel called this latter part of Geboy’s testimony a “[c]omplete surprise” to him. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218750 - 2018-09-12
the controls.” Counsel called this latter part of Geboy’s testimony a “[c]omplete surprise” to him. ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218750 - 2018-09-12
[PDF]
Robert M. Pace v. Circuit Court for Oneida County
proceedings are not part of this record because the Paces did not appeal the board's decision to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13500 - 2017-09-21
proceedings are not part of this record because the Paces did not appeal the board's decision to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13500 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. The State agreed to dismiss and read in four other charges as part of the pleas. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102015 - 2013-09-12
. The State agreed to dismiss and read in four other charges as part of the pleas. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102015 - 2013-09-12
[PDF]
State v. John S. Bergmann
County Circuit Court. As the State points out, however, the expungement order was not a part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14344 - 2014-09-15
County Circuit Court. As the State points out, however, the expungement order was not a part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14344 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
The closest the County comes to addressing this part of the circuit court’s decision is its assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34375 - 2014-09-15
The closest the County comes to addressing this part of the circuit court’s decision is its assertion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34375 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the court’s exercise of discretion, the court need not address the other part of the test. Id., ¶38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205875 - 2017-12-21
the court’s exercise of discretion, the court need not address the other part of the test. Id., ¶38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205875 - 2017-12-21