Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 59393 for quit claim deed.
Lauderdale Lakes Lake Management District v. Armijit Sidhu
and Jaswinder Sidhu, Cross-Claim Defendants- Appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7134 - 2005-03-31
and Jaswinder Sidhu, Cross-Claim Defendants- Appellants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7134 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of their claim. ¶7 In 2002, Katz asked for a tax reassessment on the building because, as he put it, “[v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68884 - 2011-08-23
of their claim. ¶7 In 2002, Katz asked for a tax reassessment on the building because, as he put it, “[v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68884 - 2011-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS
of $681,427.02. AAPP paid the full amount. In 2011, AAPP filed a claim against the City for recovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136564 - 2015-03-04
of $681,427.02. AAPP paid the full amount. In 2011, AAPP filed a claim against the City for recovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136564 - 2015-03-04
[PDF]
State v. David J. Lenz
arrearages previously incurred. He claims that whether one pays arrearages has no effect on the child’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15332 - 2017-09-21
arrearages previously incurred. He claims that whether one pays arrearages has no effect on the child’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Strand
counsel claimed would in effect retry those prior cases; and (5) the State failed to prove by expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3906 - 2017-09-20
counsel claimed would in effect retry those prior cases; and (5) the State failed to prove by expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3906 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
City of Watertown v. Jeffrey M. Wagner
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5354 - 2017-09-19
claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5354 - 2017-09-19
Bruce Gordon, M.D. v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
jurisdiction over Gordon’s claim for costs and fees, given that he did not apply for an award of costs within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14315 - 2005-03-31
jurisdiction over Gordon’s claim for costs and fees, given that he did not apply for an award of costs within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14315 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derrick L. Madlock
appeals. DISCUSSION 1. Waiver We first address the State’s claim of waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14528 - 2005-03-31
appeals. DISCUSSION 1. Waiver We first address the State’s claim of waiver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14528 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
claims made against the Broders. Acuity asserts that the Broders’ argument is based on an unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37015 - 2009-07-06
claims made against the Broders. Acuity asserts that the Broders’ argument is based on an unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37015 - 2009-07-06
State v. Craig R. Nelson
or motive.” See § 908.01(4)(a)2. The State counters that Nelson has waived any claim of error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21048 - 2006-01-24
or motive.” See § 908.01(4)(a)2. The State counters that Nelson has waived any claim of error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21048 - 2006-01-24