Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 58508 for speedy trial.
Search results 30591 - 30600 of 58508 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Richard J. Snyder v. Badgerland Mobile Homes, Inc.
and Carol Snyder appeal from the trial court’s order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5042 - 2017-09-19
and Carol Snyder appeal from the trial court’s order granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5042 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rana R. Lofthus v. Paul Malcolm Lofthus
statutes. While we disagree with some of the trial court’s rationale, we nonetheless reject Paul’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6638 - 2017-09-20
statutes. While we disagree with some of the trial court’s rationale, we nonetheless reject Paul’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6638 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Victor Naydihor
. The resentencing produced an increased sentence. On appeal, Naydihor argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4609 - 2017-09-19
. The resentencing produced an increased sentence. On appeal, Naydihor argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4609 - 2017-09-19
Robert P. Goldstein v. Janusz Chiropractic Clinics
, and Joan P. Pilak, Gerald Pilak’s surviving spouse, appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12042 - 2005-03-31
, and Joan P. Pilak, Gerald Pilak’s surviving spouse, appeal from the trial court’s order granting summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12042 - 2005-03-31
Rana R. Lofthus v. Paul Malcolm Lofthus
of the trial court’s rationale, we nonetheless reject Paul’s arguments and affirm the orders. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6638 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court’s rationale, we nonetheless reject Paul’s arguments and affirm the orders. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6638 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 12, 2009 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of App...
the evidentiary hearing are provided in the discussion section. ¶9 The trial court denied Jayvonne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35873 - 2009-03-11
the evidentiary hearing are provided in the discussion section. ¶9 The trial court denied Jayvonne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35873 - 2009-03-11
2007 WI APP 116
argues the court’s finding him a habitual criminal violated his right to a jury trial. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28507 - 2007-04-26
argues the court’s finding him a habitual criminal violated his right to a jury trial. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28507 - 2007-04-26
State v. Victor Naydihor
trial counsel was ineffective at the resentencing for failing to object to certain remarks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2005-03-31
trial counsel was ineffective at the resentencing for failing to object to certain remarks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 116
right to a jury trial. We disagree with LaCount’s arguments and, accordingly, affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28507 - 2014-09-15
right to a jury trial. We disagree with LaCount’s arguments and, accordingly, affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28507 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that Waupaca County did not meet its burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=505277 - 2022-04-07
argues that Waupaca County did not meet its burden to prove by clear and convincing evidence at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=505277 - 2022-04-07