Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, voluntarily, and intelligently entered; (2) whether the circuit court should have granted Pocian’s motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305190 - 2020-11-18
, voluntarily, and intelligently entered; (2) whether the circuit court should have granted Pocian’s motions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305190 - 2020-11-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
supplemental motion for plea withdrawal and No. 2007AP540 2 resentencing.1 The issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32438 - 2014-09-15
supplemental motion for plea withdrawal and No. 2007AP540 2 resentencing.1 The issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32438 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction order summarily denying his supplemental motion for plea withdrawal and resentencing.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32438 - 2008-04-14
a postconviction order summarily denying his supplemental motion for plea withdrawal and resentencing.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32438 - 2008-04-14
State v. Donnelly Smith
, J.[1] Donnelly Smith appeals from orders denying his motions to withdraw his guilty pleas in two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26267 - 2006-08-21
, J.[1] Donnelly Smith appeals from orders denying his motions to withdraw his guilty pleas in two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26267 - 2006-08-21
[PDF]
State v. Donnelly Smith
to entertain a 974.06 motion brought by a person who is not in custody under sentence of a court.” Jessen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26267 - 2017-09-21
to entertain a 974.06 motion brought by a person who is not in custody under sentence of a court.” Jessen v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26267 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the parties’ joint recommendation of six months in jail. Having independently reviewed the record, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524798 - 2022-05-24
the parties’ joint recommendation of six months in jail. Having independently reviewed the record, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=524798 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide, and an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70913 - 2014-09-15
convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide, and an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70913 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide, and an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70913 - 2011-09-14
convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide, and an order denying his postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70913 - 2011-09-14
State v. Steven L. Harris
in possession of a firearm and from orders denying his motions for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20351 - 2005-11-22
in possession of a firearm and from orders denying his motions for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20351 - 2005-11-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion was filed prior to the entry of Watenphul’s guilty plea. The admissibility of any statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282416 - 2020-08-27
motion was filed prior to the entry of Watenphul’s guilty plea. The admissibility of any statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282416 - 2020-08-27