Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 6659 for mix.

2011 WI APP 57
that in analyzing the facts and the arguments, it “had a lot of mixed feelings” including that “both [sides] set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60484 - 2011-04-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, and Gantner admitted that he had a mixed drink with vodka an hour earlier. The officer checked Gantner’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35454 - 2009-02-04

[PDF] WI App 124
. 2d 171, 641 N.W.2d 158. Whether a duty has been breached is a mixed question of law and fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88300 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Richard W. Hendrickson
of counsel claims present questions of mixed law and fact. State v. Moffett, 147 Wis. 2d 343, 352, 433 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3036 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Henry L. Williams
’ argument mixes the requirements for a constitutionally valid plea with the requirements for proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3155 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 230
, the parties agree that, unless the “clarifications” are thrown into the mix, the “asbestos content
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26961 - 2014-09-15

Local 617 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
the commission’s conclusion that the bargaining history evidence was mixed or inconclusive. Local 617 argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4098 - 2005-03-31

State v. Nicholas D. Kasten
presents mixed questions of fact and law. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 633-34, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7583 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
frivolously presents a mixed question of fact and law. See Storms, 309 Wis. 2d 704, ¶35. What the litigant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85730 - 2012-08-07

[PDF] Dane County Department of Human Services v. Kenneth M.
Whether trial counsel provided ineffective assistance is a mixed question of law and fact. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20284 - 2017-09-21