Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 12458 for mr.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 12458 for mr.
2007 WI APP 227
was “pleading guilty because you are guilty?” THE DEFENDANT: I’m guilty up to a point, ma’am. THE COURT: Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30367 - 2007-10-30
was “pleading guilty because you are guilty?” THE DEFENDANT: I’m guilty up to a point, ma’am. THE COURT: Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30367 - 2007-10-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
shot Strong, but “[a]ll witnesses that saw the shooting … agreed that Mr. Lyons was a shooter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301065 - 2020-11-04
shot Strong, but “[a]ll witnesses that saw the shooting … agreed that Mr. Lyons was a shooter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301065 - 2020-11-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
was pleading guilty to substantial battery against her advice. According to Potter: “Mr. Meeks was very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28538 - 2014-09-15
was pleading guilty to substantial battery against her advice. According to Potter: “Mr. Meeks was very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28538 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
: THE COURT: Okay. [Trial counsel] tells me that you want to go ahead with your trial, Mr. Brown. [Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51174 - 2014-09-15
: THE COURT: Okay. [Trial counsel] tells me that you want to go ahead with your trial, Mr. Brown. [Brown
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51174 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI 3
in the rule. Mr. Levine said that reciprocity provisions penalize individual attorneys who have no control
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35120 - 2014-09-15
in the rule. Mr. Levine said that reciprocity provisions penalize individual attorneys who have no control
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35120 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that you want to go ahead with your trial, Mr. Brown. [Brown]: Yes. THE COURT: Okay. So I am letting you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51174 - 2010-06-21
that you want to go ahead with your trial, Mr. Brown. [Brown]: Yes. THE COURT: Okay. So I am letting you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51174 - 2010-06-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
to investigate and ultimately to sanction Mr. Tatung for any misconduct pursuant to Maryland Rule 8.5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704590 - 2023-09-15
to investigate and ultimately to sanction Mr. Tatung for any misconduct pursuant to Maryland Rule 8.5
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=704590 - 2023-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
an owner of the phone number that I was talking about.” This exchange followed: MR. CEMAN [Prosecutor]: I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107272 - 2014-01-28
an owner of the phone number that I was talking about.” This exchange followed: MR. CEMAN [Prosecutor]: I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107272 - 2014-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
report upon which Mr. Campbell [JC Penney’s vocational expert] based his estimate of loss of earning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
report upon which Mr. Campbell [JC Penney’s vocational expert] based his estimate of loss of earning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49312 - 2010-04-27
COURT OF APPEALS
to be fair to the State and to Mr. Richardson[.]” Gregory G. responded, “I don’t know. I guess it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104433 - 2013-11-18
to be fair to the State and to Mr. Richardson[.]” Gregory G. responded, “I don’t know. I guess it would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104433 - 2013-11-18