Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 50064 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 3061 - 3070 of 50064 for writ of certiorari forms.
Frontsheet
petitioned the circuit court for a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling the City of Kenosha and Steve
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36828 - 2009-06-16
petitioned the circuit court for a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling the City of Kenosha and Steve
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36828 - 2009-06-16
[PDF]
WI 52
petitioned the circuit court for a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling the City of Kenosha and Steve
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36828 - 2014-09-15
petitioned the circuit court for a peremptory writ of mandamus compelling the City of Kenosha and Steve
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36828 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sought certiorari review and declaratory judgment in the circuit court. The court affirmed the board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180957 - 2017-09-21
sought certiorari review and declaratory judgment in the circuit court. The court affirmed the board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180957 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
MEE Bellevue, LLC v. Winnebago County
of the application. MEE appealed the board of adjustment’s decision by this certiorari action. No. 03-2158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6764 - 2017-09-20
of the application. MEE appealed the board of adjustment’s decision by this certiorari action. No. 03-2158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6764 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
to shoreline vegetation. ¶5 Chicilo petitioned the circuit court for certiorari review.[1] He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32164 - 2008-03-17
to shoreline vegetation. ¶5 Chicilo petitioned the circuit court for certiorari review.[1] He also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32164 - 2008-03-17
[PDF]
WI APP 120
, RESPONDENTS. Opinion Filed: June 26, 2008 Submitted on Writ of Mandamus: January 14, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33187 - 2014-09-15
, RESPONDENTS. Opinion Filed: June 26, 2008 Submitted on Writ of Mandamus: January 14, 2008
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33187 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
Attorney, Respondents. Opinion Filed: June 26, 2008 Submitted on Writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33187 - 2005-03-31
Attorney, Respondents. Opinion Filed: June 26, 2008 Submitted on Writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33187 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
postconviction relief in the form of a new trial. Because we agree with the circuit court that his claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110576 - 2014-04-22
postconviction relief in the form of a new trial. Because we agree with the circuit court that his claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110576 - 2014-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction relief in the form of a new trial. Because we agree with the circuit court that his claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110576 - 2017-09-21
postconviction relief in the form of a new trial. Because we agree with the circuit court that his claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110576 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
The Wisconsin Supreme Court voted to accept four cases at its February 12, 2025 conference
2024AP2015-W Conley v. Karas [Writ of Mandamus] 2024AP2235-W Bach v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
/supreme/docs/021225cal.pdf - 2025-03-17
2024AP2015-W Conley v. Karas [Writ of Mandamus] 2024AP2235-W Bach v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
/supreme/docs/021225cal.pdf - 2025-03-17