Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30601 - 30610 of 83945 for case search.
Search results 30601 - 30610 of 83945 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Earl Gordon
the agreement, noted that the State would not use any statements made by Gordon to Erdmann in its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8819 - 2017-09-19
the agreement, noted that the State would not use any statements made by Gordon to Erdmann in its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8819 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Erica S.
SIMANEK, Judge. Affirmed. No. 00-2110 2 ¶1 BROWN, P.J.1 The issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2884 - 2017-09-19
SIMANEK, Judge. Affirmed. No. 00-2110 2 ¶1 BROWN, P.J.1 The issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2884 - 2017-09-19
State v. John A. Rupp
of $8,868.96. ¶5 On June 30, 1999, in an unrelated Fond du Lac county case, Rupp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2810 - 2005-03-31
of $8,868.96. ¶5 On June 30, 1999, in an unrelated Fond du Lac county case, Rupp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2810 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary No. 2021AP628 2 disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522347 - 2022-05-24
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary No. 2021AP628 2 disposition. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522347 - 2022-05-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
for judgment or discretion. The County directs our attention to Ottinger. The plaintiff in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35979 - 2014-09-15
for judgment or discretion. The County directs our attention to Ottinger. The plaintiff in that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35979 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Floyd W. Hipsher
person in the juror’s position objectively could not judge the case in a fair and impartial manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5665 - 2017-09-19
person in the juror’s position objectively could not judge the case in a fair and impartial manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5665 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Richard I. Wang, M.D. v. gan Ivankovic
. Wang, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from a small claims collection action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7539 - 2017-09-19
. Wang, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case arises from a small claims collection action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7539 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sara V.
, and NANCY E. WHEELER, Judge. Orders reversed. BROWN, J. In this CHIPS case, Sara V. alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9654 - 2017-09-19
, and NANCY E. WHEELER, Judge. Orders reversed. BROWN, J. In this CHIPS case, Sara V. alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9654 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reject that argument and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 In this Barron County case, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197783 - 2017-10-17
reject that argument and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 In this Barron County case, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197783 - 2017-10-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DISCUSSION ¶9 When the State claims that an erroneous suppression ruling in a criminal case was harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94600 - 2014-09-15
DISCUSSION ¶9 When the State claims that an erroneous suppression ruling in a criminal case was harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94600 - 2014-09-15