Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30601 - 30610 of 69092 for he.
Search results 30601 - 30610 of 69092 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 raising twenty-one issues. He then filed a supplemental motion raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162835 - 2017-09-21
under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 raising twenty-one issues. He then filed a supplemental motion raising
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162835 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2013AP2640-CR 2 began his probationary term in December 2012. 2 Within a day of his release, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122247 - 2014-09-24
. No. 2013AP2640-CR 2 began his probationary term in December 2012. 2 Within a day of his release, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122247 - 2014-09-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of narcotic drugs. He argues: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050921 - 2025-12-17
of narcotic drugs. He argues: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; and (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1050921 - 2025-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a response asserting that the victim was still highly intoxicated when he signed off
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209859 - 2018-03-13
filed a response asserting that the victim was still highly intoxicated when he signed off
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209859 - 2018-03-13
[PDF]
State v. Lyle W. Jourdan
) and 343.44(2g)(e), STATS. Jourdan alleges that the State failed to prove, and he did not admit, his prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10489 - 2017-09-20
) and 343.44(2g)(e), STATS. Jourdan alleges that the State failed to prove, and he did not admit, his prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10489 - 2017-09-20
State v. Robert L. Collins
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4439 - 2005-03-31
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial due to ineffective assistance of counsel. On appeal, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4439 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
) (2011-12).[1] He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147839 - 2015-08-27
) (2011-12).[1] He contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147839 - 2015-08-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, appeals an order denying his most recent postconviction motion. Brown contends that he is entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610223 - 2023-01-18
, appeals an order denying his most recent postconviction motion. Brown contends that he is entitled
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=610223 - 2023-01-18
95 CV 784 Robert Garel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
review of his probation and parole revocations. He claims the circuit court erred by issuing a nunc pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15454 - 2005-03-31
review of his probation and parole revocations. He claims the circuit court erred by issuing a nunc pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15454 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
assaulting her.” Edmonson alleged that he was entitled to recover damages “including, but not limited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110814 - 2014-04-29
assaulting her.” Edmonson alleged that he was entitled to recover damages “including, but not limited
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110814 - 2014-04-29