Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30611 - 30620 of 39127 for c's.
Search results 30611 - 30620 of 39127 for c's.
CA Blank Order
. Stat. § 971.08(1)(c). A plea withdrawal is permitted upon such a failure if the defendant later shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98879 - 2013-07-02
. Stat. § 971.08(1)(c). A plea withdrawal is permitted upon such a failure if the defendant later shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98879 - 2013-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Door County: PETER C. DILTZ, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97907 - 2013-06-10
an order of the circuit court for Door County: PETER C. DILTZ, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97907 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., the third statutory factor. See WIS. STAT. § 48.426(3)(c). In making its findings, the court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250709 - 2019-12-03
., the third statutory factor. See WIS. STAT. § 48.426(3)(c). In making its findings, the court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250709 - 2019-12-03
State v. Susan Holzl
was right behind her because I pulled her from the vehicle. [She] [c]losed the fist; it was a fist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13333 - 2005-03-31
was right behind her because I pulled her from the vehicle. [She] [c]losed the fist; it was a fist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13333 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] The Honorable Frederick C. Rosa presided over the proceedings when Stokes’ attorney withdrew. The Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40239 - 2009-08-31
] The Honorable Frederick C. Rosa presided over the proceedings when Stokes’ attorney withdrew. The Honorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40239 - 2009-08-31
[PDF]
Chavis J. Sheriff v. Edwardo G. Arellano, M.D.
that Radkowski's discovery deposition should have been admissible at trial under § 804.07(1)(c), STATS., which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7869 - 2017-09-19
that Radkowski's discovery deposition should have been admissible at trial under § 804.07(1)(c), STATS., which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7869 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John C. Baker, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97503 - 2013-05-29
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John C. Baker, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97503 - 2013-05-29
State v. Lavelle Allison
of the person so harmed is guilty of a Class C felony." Section 939.22(14), Stats., 1991-92, defines "great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8475 - 2005-03-31
of the person so harmed is guilty of a Class C felony." Section 939.22(14), Stats., 1991-92, defines "great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8475 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2005-06). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31892 - 2014-09-15
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(c) (2005-06). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31892 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
brief indicates: Because it “is a legal question ... the [c]ourt could make its own determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79942 - 2014-09-15
brief indicates: Because it “is a legal question ... the [c]ourt could make its own determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79942 - 2014-09-15