Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30621 - 30630 of 69131 for he.
Search results 30621 - 30630 of 69131 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
that he should have been allowed to present information at trial about the disclosure requirements under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28366 - 2007-03-07
that he should have been allowed to present information at trial about the disclosure requirements under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28366 - 2007-03-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
the court’s finding that probable cause existed to believe that he was operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52691 - 2014-09-15
the court’s finding that probable cause existed to believe that he was operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52691 - 2014-09-15
95 CV 784 Robert Garel v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
review of his probation and parole revocations. He claims the circuit court erred by issuing a nunc pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15454 - 2005-03-31
review of his probation and parole revocations. He claims the circuit court erred by issuing a nunc pro
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15454 - 2005-03-31
Anderson B. Connor v. Sara Connor
, and concluded that his alleged belief that he had a courtesy extension did not constitute excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15412 - 2005-03-31
, and concluded that his alleged belief that he had a courtesy extension did not constitute excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15412 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David G. Maddox
by intoxicated operation of a motor vehicle, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(2)(a)1. 2 He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6094 - 2017-09-19
by intoxicated operation of a motor vehicle, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(2)(a)1. 2 He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6094 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William Lee
testimony may explain No(s). 99-1764 3 why he took particular action on Lee’s defense. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15716 - 2017-09-21
testimony may explain No(s). 99-1764 3 why he took particular action on Lee’s defense. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15716 - 2017-09-21
County of Oneida v. Donald L. Clarksen
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. He was transported to the Oneida County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15606 - 2005-03-31
vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. He was transported to the Oneida County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15606 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a motion to suppress the evidence, arguing that he “was seized and detained in the absence of an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285342 - 2020-09-09
a motion to suppress the evidence, arguing that he “was seized and detained in the absence of an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285342 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
State v. Pierre Davis
a motor vehicle without the owner's consent (OMVWOC). He also appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9668 - 2017-09-19
a motor vehicle without the owner's consent (OMVWOC). He also appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9668 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lyle W. Jourdan
) and 343.44(2g)(e), STATS. Jourdan alleges that the State failed to prove, and he did not admit, his prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10490 - 2017-09-20
) and 343.44(2g)(e), STATS. Jourdan alleges that the State failed to prove, and he did not admit, his prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10490 - 2017-09-20