Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30621 - 30630 of 44624 for part.

[PDF] State v. Timothy Netzer
provisions provide, in relevant part, as follows: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12587 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James T. Carey, Jr. v. Ted Swiontek, Sr.
an "override" provision as follows: [I]f, as to the property or any part of it, a purchaser is procured
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11072 - 2017-09-19

Dick's Fireside, Inc. v. Willis Corroon Corporation of Wisconsin, Inc.
' accounting practice that arbitrarily classified part of their theater revenue as food revenue. In 1983
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7935 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
it is not to his benefit. It is true that Part D of Title IV of the Social Security Act (codified at 42 U.S.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277239 - 2020-08-12

COURT OF APPEALS
appendix are not part of the record. We have disregarded all information or documents improperly submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143895 - 2015-07-06

[PDF] State v. Patricia A.M.
., provides in relevant part: 48.424 Fact-finding hearing. …. (4) If grounds for the termination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12557 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
such misunderstandings on Stueber’s part were immaterial to the findings necessary to No. 2019AP1658 6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338943 - 2021-02-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to a “failure on the State’s part.” Then, noting that Walker was not at fault for the conflict necessitating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16

Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas M.
as required by § 48.365(2m)(a), Stats. Section 48.365(2m)(a) provides, in pertinent part, that “the findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15066 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Bernard A. Graef
-4- The two-part test for assessing counsel's representation under the Sixth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10061 - 2017-09-19