Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30631 - 30640 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] NOTICE
relationship with him. ¶8 On July 26, 2005, the court conducted a trial on Petty’s physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28730 - 2014-09-15

2007 WI APP 152
of Christina’s expert economist and for a remittitur or new trial following the jury verdict. American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29238 - 2007-06-26

Milwaukee County v. Theodore S.
that this is a discretionary review of the record to be held in a timely manner prior to the final hearing or trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16985 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ervin Burris
, 165 Wis.2d 585, 591, 478 N.W.2d 37, 39 (Ct. App. 1991); and even in cases where the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13204 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Sheri Gould v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of appeals' decision remanding the case to the trial court for a determination of Monicken's capacity
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16892 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
at Vinnie’s Rock Bottom Saloon in Jefferson. ¶3 The following facts are taken from the trial. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93187 - 2014-09-15

Marlene Brown v. David G. Dibbell, M.D.
negligent. Dibbell cross-appeals, asserting that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12800 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of trial counsel. Carroll asserts that the circuit court erred when it declined to continue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206797 - 2018-01-17

Milwaukee County v. Louise M.
that this is a discretionary review of the record to be held in a timely manner prior to the final hearing or trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16984 - 2005-03-31

Sheri Gould v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
of Monicken's incapacity, we reverse the part of the court of appeals' decision remanding the case to the trial
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16892 - 2005-03-31