Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30641 - 30650 of 58492 for speedy trial.

Precision Cable Assemblies LLC v. Central Resistor Corporation
motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Central Resistor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3136 - 2005-03-31

Cheryl D. v. Robert D.B.
affirm the trial court’s order. Robert died of cancer in December 1994. Robert’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10130 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was not obligated to plead guilty and could proceed to trial, to which Solomon responded, “I can’t afford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219535 - 2018-09-25

COURT OF APPEALS
On July 26, 2005, the court conducted a trial on Petty’s physical placement petition. By operation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28730 - 2007-04-16

Frank Murphy v. Bruno Independent Living Aids
interfered with any contract between the parties. The trial court agreed and granted the motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4144 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ontario D. Lowery
and remand for a new trial.1 Background ¶2 On January 9, 2001, Ontario Lowery and Jamus Reed were driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4432 - 2017-09-19

Menard, Inc. v. Liteway Lighting Products
claims that the trial court applied the wrong burden of proof, requiring Liteway to disprove Menard’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6517 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ervin Burris
, 165 Wis.2d 585, 591, 478 N.W.2d 37, 39 (Ct. App. 1991); and even in cases where the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13204 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Marlene Brown v. David G. Dibbell, M.D.
was contributorily negligent. Dibbell cross-appeals, asserting that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12800 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ervin Burris
37, 39 (Ct. App. 1991); and even in cases where the trial court fails to adequately state the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13204 - 2005-03-31