Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30671 - 30680 of 66174 for e j.

COURT OF APPEALS
to some aspect of his judgment of conviction. As the supreme court has stated, “[w]e need finality in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28957 - 2007-06-26

CA Blank Order
District IV September 23, 2013 To: Hon. William E. Hanrahan Circuit Court Judge 215 South
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102254 - 2013-09-22

[PDF] CA Blank Order
To: Hon. Stephen E. Ehlke Circuit Court Judge Branch 15 215 S. Hamilton St., Rm. 7107 Madison, WI
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284553 - 2020-09-03

[PDF] CA Blank Order
facts by clear and convincing evidence. See § 51.20(13)(e). Additionally, Dave’s testimony satisfies
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215003 - 2018-07-03

State v. Ladarwin D. Copeland
(THC), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(3g)(e). The circuit court sentenced Copeland to two years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25908 - 2006-08-29

Talib Amin Akbar v. Stephen Kronzer
having custody of the prisoner shall also follow the same procedure. Sec. 814.29(1m)(e). Akbar’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7071 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that “[e]ither party may file a demand for trial within 10 days from the date of an oral decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190821 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
(1)(b). Under this statute, “[e]ach judgment shall specify the relief granted or other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723951 - 2023-11-02

[PDF] State v. Deandra S. Carter
), 961.01(14), and 961.41(3g)(e), STATS. Carter claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12704 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d) and (e) (setting forth the requirements for an appellant’s brief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93275 - 2014-09-15