Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 30671 - 30680 of 68246 for law.

State v. Trenton McAdoo
on the appropriate and applicable law.” A circuit court should freely allow a defendant to withdraw his plea prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13311 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, but that the law had changed and those options were not available to him. The elimination of parole and good-time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32438 - 2008-04-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that probable cause existed to temporarily detain C.M.L. after law enforcement filed a statement of emergency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236109 - 2019-02-26

[PDF] State v. Terrance J. Trammell
of reasonableness, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. King, 175 Wis. 2d 146, 150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16023 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Milwaukee County v. Theodore S.
: Emergency detention. (1) BASIS FOR DETENTION. (a) A law enforcement officer or other person authorized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8578 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to entitle him to a hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175263 - 2017-09-21

State v. Eric Garcia
. Whether a search is reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, however, is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7313 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rex B. Roberts
is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis.2d 128, 137-38, 456 N.W.2d 830
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8149 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] William Charles Sharp v. Thomas M. Hughes
a two-day bench trial, the court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and issued a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18163 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, which advocated for a change in that law. However, as the court explained, “[w]hether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558959 - 2022-08-25