Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 3963 for davi.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 3963 for davi.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sentence.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶27, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823. A court “properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990081 - 2025-07-29
sentence.” State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶27, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d 823. A court “properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990081 - 2025-07-29
[PDF]
Treatment court best practices and recordkeeping
Elliott Levine, La Crosse County, chair; Judge Cynthia Davis, Milwaukee County; Judge Gregory Gill, Jr
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/treatmentbestpractices.pdf - 2021-12-09
Elliott Levine, La Crosse County, chair; Judge Cynthia Davis, Milwaukee County; Judge Gregory Gill, Jr
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/treatmentbestpractices.pdf - 2021-12-09
[PDF]
Risk and need: Implementing multiple tracks in your treatment court program
. Hon. Peggy Davis Hon. Richard Vlavianos Target high-risk high-need (Biggest impact on recidivism
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/multipletracks.pdf - 2021-09-23
. Hon. Peggy Davis Hon. Richard Vlavianos Target high-risk high-need (Biggest impact on recidivism
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/multipletracks.pdf - 2021-09-23
[PDF]
Memo in support of Supreme Court Rule petition 23-05
Grode Lynne Davis Christine Casey State Public Defender’s Office Public Defender Kelli S
/supreme/docs/2305memo.pdf - 2023-10-12
Grode Lynne Davis Christine Casey State Public Defender’s Office Public Defender Kelli S
/supreme/docs/2305memo.pdf - 2023-10-12
[PDF]
WI 25
dismissing a case as improvidently granted is proper. See State ex rel. Davis v. Cir. Ct. for Dane Cnty
/supreme/docs/23ap70.pdf - 2025-06-24
dismissing a case as improvidently granted is proper. See State ex rel. Davis v. Cir. Ct. for Dane Cnty
/supreme/docs/23ap70.pdf - 2025-06-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
physically.” Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315 (1974) (citation omitted). The “primary interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982962 - 2025-07-16
physically.” Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 315 (1974) (citation omitted). The “primary interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982962 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
State v. Odell Fisher
, and child rearing and education.” Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 713 (1976). The privacy interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10994 - 2017-09-19
, and child rearing and education.” Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 713 (1976). The privacy interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10994 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 102
is that a litigant is not bound by his prior waiver of a jury trial.”); F.M. Davies & Co. v. Porter, 248 F. 397
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99845 - 2017-09-21
is that a litigant is not bound by his prior waiver of a jury trial.”); F.M. Davies & Co. v. Porter, 248 F. 397
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99845 - 2017-09-21
John S. Kowalchuk v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
) (an employer is “not required to present an expert medical opinion to support a legitimate doubt”); Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15477 - 2005-03-31
) (an employer is “not required to present an expert medical opinion to support a legitimate doubt”); Davis v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15477 - 2005-03-31
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Franklin Gillette
in the world,” and that coverage was specifically provided in Canada. [11] See Davis v. American Family Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2351 - 2005-03-31
in the world,” and that coverage was specifically provided in Canada. [11] See Davis v. American Family Mut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2351 - 2005-03-31