Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 29821 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to limit cross-examination. Id., ¶25. We review de novo the question of whether the trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573856 - 2022-10-05

wi app 78 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP3166-CR Complete Title...
they require is de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis. 2d 191, 201, 496 N.W.2d 57, 61 (1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64184 - 2011-06-28

[PDF] Robert Schmitz v. Fire Insurance Exchange
of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7547 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and application of a statute to an undisputed set of facts are issues of law that we review de novo. Doe 56
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999337 - 2025-08-21

COURT OF APPEALS
should be reviewed de novo, or at least under the due weight standard in reviewing whether Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33192 - 2008-08-26

[PDF] Walgreen Co. v. Wisconsin Pharmacy Examining Board
to the agency’s interpretation; we will review it de novo, giving it “no weight at all.” UFE, 201 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12526 - 2017-09-21

State v. Justin Yang
, however, is a matter that we review de novo. State v. Pittman, 174 Wis. 2d 255, 275, 496 N.W.2d 74, 82
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21469 - 2006-03-22

[PDF] State v. Fontaine Baker
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4253 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. James E. Thomas
de novo. See id. “[I]f the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14398 - 2014-09-15

2010 WI APP 25
of the Board, not that of the circuit court, and we do so de novo. State ex rel. Sprewell v. McCaughtry, 226
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45402 - 2010-02-23