Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 68485 for did.
Search results 3071 - 3080 of 68485 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the arresting officer did not sufficiently convey to her the implied consent warnings related to § 343.305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173922 - 2017-09-21
that the arresting officer did not sufficiently convey to her the implied consent warnings related to § 343.305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
made to police during a custodial interrogation for two reasons: (1) he did not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271132 - 2020-07-21
made to police during a custodial interrogation for two reasons: (1) he did not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=271132 - 2020-07-21
Rock County DHS v. Jessica L.
and justifiable excuse and the court therefore did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20154 - 2005-11-01
and justifiable excuse and the court therefore did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20154 - 2005-11-01
[PDF]
Kathleen M. Schmitt v. Arnold C. Schmitt
. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2384 - 2017-09-19
. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2384 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Rock County DHS v. Jessica L.
and the court therefore did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The Rock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20154 - 2017-09-21
and the court therefore did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The Rock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20154 - 2017-09-21
State v. Iran D. Evans
pro se. The motion alleged that Evans did not make a valid waiver of his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5465 - 2005-03-31
pro se. The motion alleged that Evans did not make a valid waiver of his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5465 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and did not err by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227050 - 2018-11-13
and did not err by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227050 - 2018-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
in the interests of justice. We conclude that the delay was not unfairly prejudicial, he did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36478 - 2009-05-19
in the interests of justice. We conclude that the delay was not unfairly prejudicial, he did not receive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36478 - 2009-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that she and Jones had a verbal argument, but she maintained Jones did not hit her. She stated she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70381 - 2011-08-29
that she and Jones had a verbal argument, but she maintained Jones did not hit her. She stated she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70381 - 2011-08-29
State v. Shomari L. Robinson
did not, that “[t]he major portion of the witnesses that I have have to do with this car.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2552 - 2005-03-31
did not, that “[t]he major portion of the witnesses that I have have to do with this car.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2552 - 2005-03-31